Evos say the geneology between Jesus and Adam is not valid. Darwins geneology is also not valid.
It is not to be taken litterally.
His argument is this: can you actually prove Darwin existed? NO...you can't. *facepalm*
-Erin
Evos say the geneology between Jesus and Adam is not valid. Darwins geneology is also not valid.
It is not to be taken litterally.
C4: YOU are the one guilty of 'scientism' blind one. You aren't even close to scientific truth. What are you going to do when geologists dig up a T-Rex out of 70 million yr old rock and it is discovered that it has a human in its belly?
That day is coming.
Stars will fall to earth. Says the bible. A third of them. How big could they be??
Mt 24:29 -Immediately after the tribulation of those days shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken:
Re 6:13 -And the stars of heaven fell unto the earth, even as a fig tree casteth her untimely figs, when she is shaken of a mighty wind.
Re 12:4 -And his tail drew the third part of the stars of heaven, and did cast them to the earth
how big could they really be if they fall to earth?
(In response to "you don't know what a star is): Why don't you tell us then, and give an example of one a million ly or more away?
If stars are composed of more than, or other than physical only material, your scenario is trashed. How many little demons falling to earth would boil the seas??
Example of these 'gravitational' effects? You guys are one piece of work, Hawking credits present gravity with no less than creation.
Let's see the evidence for that claim. Story telling.
great, so measure all that for Alpha Centauri.
False. Not if they are not physical.
Eag: Pawn is a legitimate spelling of pwn. Makes more sense too.
Atheist: we have a pretty good grip on the weather by now - no miracles involved.
Sport: oh really. start at the sub atomic particles in the sky and work up. you can also explain to me how the water evaporates and forms clouds. I'd like to hear this.
Hereditary baggage is not evolution.
RB: The GC is just sedimentary rock anyways.
Me: Negative - there are igneous intrusions at the GC seen at the bottom of the canyon.
RB: Rock type is irrelevant. The processes are the same except for very hard or very soft.
SuperSport: We tell our kids that God created them through our love.
RJ: However, when it comes to the actual biology of conception, I hope you go beyond that. Or don't you believe in sperm and egg either?
SuperSport: eh...the sperm and the egg aren't really important.
All evolutionists are part of the cover up. It is not God they are covering up, it is ET's. That is the real reason behind the show between creationism and evolution. They are actually OK with the masses believing one or the other---but not this. Religion is also part of the coverup. That was the reason religion--mainly Judaism and subsequently Christianity and Islam--were invented--the old pagan Gods were ET's and the ancient texts and religions are alegories and factual depictions of our true origins.
Eag: They [the Sumerians] knew that the earth had broken crust as continents and gave a reason for it--a clash with another planet, which is the planet the gods were supposed to have been from.
There are no homophobics here, go post your propaganda and nonsense elsewhere.
Please! No one fears homosexuals, people may be disgusted or pity their mental illness and lifestyles, but hardly fear them. Ever see a bunch of homosexuals in one of their parades???? PLEASE again, fear????
They look like a bunch of perverted clowns needing to be given a shot of Thorazine...
I am always impressed when one feels the need to speak with such condensention, it is always very informative of who the speaker really is.
[Mountaineer_Elf] Bob: I debunked oneness already.
[Bob] no you didnt
[Bob] you just copy and paste
[Mountaineer_Elf] Bob: I copy and pasted from the BIBLE
[Bob] elfy you didnt debunk anything at all, you just pasted some things from a book
[Mountaineer_Elf] bob: LMAO
[Mountaineer_Elf] from a book
Paraphrased because his argument was retarded:
"You cannot prove history happened"
NX: Reality is God's Creation
Dad: False.
HE: American slavery, and Egypian Slavery -- were an abomination in the sight of God.
[North] no. thier mass and the spin of the earth would have made walking whale creatures immpossible
[ChristianH] Micro Evolution, right?
[R.E.] Define "micro evolution?"
[Coke] Where Horses don't give birth to dolphins.
[NA]: I wonder if E. Coli will make it to heaven.
[J]: no, plagues wont make it
[RD] a.s.d.f do youknow why and how the 'speach gene ' only stayed with the Huminoid lines and with no other animals ?
Now...I don't actually know if there's a "speech gene". But...I'm inclined to believe that there isn't any more than there's a "cursing gene" or an "accent gene".
[Mountaineer_Elf] Elect: I didn't say there was I simply asked if you could kill babies and not ask forgiveness and still go to heaven, and you said yes.
[His_Elect] correct.
When God was planning how he was going to make monkeys, He probably wanted them to have some of the same functionality that he planned to design into man. I think He probably made monkeys similar to humans in order to further delude those who do not love Him.
What is the creationist explanation for the different types of animals ithere? Why no kangoroos in Africa? Is it adaptaion? ARe there any kangorro fossils in other places?
The standard explanation seems to be that all animals on the Ark had strong homing instincts and they just followed their noses home.
A slightly better explanation is that there is a Mount Ararat in Australia, and the Ark stopped there to let off some passengers. (There is an Ararat in Australia.)
Humm,,I allways thought it was spelled, Atheistville........That's the place where the athesist cram "Don't you dare believe in God!" down the throats of their children .
'So when the "so strong" belief is in direct conflict with observable reality, you think the more parsimonious conclusion is not that your belief is in error but that observable reality is wrong?'
"Correct -- what kind of ambassador for my faith would I be, if I didn't believe it myself?"