Saturday, May 30, 2009

Dwarf FAIL

Posted at CARM on May 30th, 2009. Possible Creationist (he/she's new) Yummy.

Yummy's first post at CARM on the Evo/ID debate forum is:
how is it there are PYGMIES + DWARFS??"

What? Yeah, I don't know either.


Friday, May 29, 2009

Eclipse FAIL

Posted at CARM on May 29th, 2009. Creationist: Yank (ex evolutionary science teacher, by the way).

Yank's understanding of the eclipse mentioned in the Bible and his defense of how he accidently proved the Gospels wrong.
"the Sun would be blocked by the EARTH, thus it would appear that the entire world (=the Moon) went dark".

Let me translate that. The sun would be blocked by the Earth (=lunar eclipse). Thus it would appear that the entire world (=the moon?) went dark (=solar eclipse). What was it? A solar or a luna eclipse? And how is the entire world the moon?

From a SCIENCE TEACHER! Now we know why the US is so damn far behind!



Posted at CARM on May 29th, 2009. Creationist: Yank (the epic).

Yank's Comment:
Anyone who thinks that those fossils I posted of fish eating other fish or being destroyed while giving birth (that from an evolutionist website no less) are not the result of instantaneous destruction and imprint upon the surrounding rocks are utterly dishonest. They aren't even worth communicating with.

I will wait to see if there are honest posters who wish to discuss this.

"...and the flood came and took them all away." Jesus Christ.

So fish give birth now?! I thought they laid eggs!



Posted at CARM on May 29th, 2009. Creationist: Yank

This fish like multiplied millions of others was killed instantly and pressure made the imprint in soft rock. WHY WAS THE ROCK SOFT at that moment? You see that's a hint that evolutionists rarely ever think about.

Geology fail at its best. why was the rock soft? Because it wasn't rock. Der. Sand that turns to stone, becomes SANDSTONE. DUH.


Thursday, May 28, 2009

Trait FAIL

Posted at CARM on May 28th, 2009. Creationist: Scar, yet again. No turkey's this time.

No back story, this is the original, starting post.

Another reason evolution is bogus. Sports superstars. Musical superstars. Indeed any superstars in a particular field.

They get born into families mostly who did not possess such outstanding talent. In many cases, the rest of their families were not even interested in their field.

Evolutionists will have us believe that the traits of parents and grandparents will be passed to the child. If this were really true then you'd find generations after generations of sportstars, musicians etc. producing world class performers. Indeed we'd find that they would have as many kids as possible in the hope one would inherit that magical gene and make a fortune.

We don't see that, do we?
Umm no. I know computers but my family doesn't. Does that mean I have a computer gene/trait? NO! Idiot.

Topic FAIL

Posted at CARM on May 27th, 2009. Creationist: Scar

Are you unaware that there is as much serious scientific debate on the occurance of evolution as there is on the existance of gravity...namely none?
Scar's response:
turkeys don't vote for Christmas

Go ahead. I'll wait for you to try and figure out what the hell that comment meant and how it fits into the conversation on "why don't scientists debate evolution with other scientists". Screen saver face.


Sunday, May 24, 2009

Magic FAIL

Posted at CARM on May 24th, 2009. Creationist: Candle.

Candles rebut to God creating being akin to magic:
Magic belongs to a realm of the spirit world that God never uses. It is the opposite to the power of God.



Friday, May 22, 2009

Scientific Illustration FAIL

Posted at CARM on May 22nd, 2009. Creationist: FM.

Original comment:
There isn't just ONE fossil that shows the evolution of fish to tetrapods (land dwellers with legs).

No, Not ONE.

I remember the fossil transition before tiktaalik came along (i still have my textbook), they knew EXACTLY what they were looking for.

FM's response:
Not a drawing of one. LOL

WOW! These are scientific illustrations based on the fossils. DORK!


Grouping FAIL

Posted at CARM on May 22nd, 2009. Poster FM.

FM's original comment: "Isn't that your hero? Darwin? A racist, sexist pig?"

Hint for the Quiz: the KKK, Aryan Nations and Christian Identity groups are unalterably PRO-Creationism.

FM's reply:
I am talking about the "Father of evolution", not some random groups of people.

Random groups of people?! Yeah...okay then. *head buried in the sand*


Genetic FAIL

Posted at CARM on May 22nd, 2009. Creationist: Sport (on the rampage again!)

Conversation: a bird in northwestern US has changed its tune due to selective pressures from the changing environment to better have the females hear the now lower, and slower, tons through the dense foliage. Sport says "where's the mutation of the genes? Therefore it's not evolution!" And his knowledge on the subject gets even better.

So, when a person learns a new language, are you saying that 'evos' claim it is the result of mutations?

Whatever are you carryiong on about?

Sport's Response:
Evos say only populations evolve. Individuals (supposedly) are stuck with their genes. Genes are dumb. Genes don't learn, right? How do you explain the fact that cells and genes (which are just dumb matter) actually learn and comprehend things?

Did anyone else picture a little strand of genetic material reading a text book? I did. :) How do genes LEARN things? By reading of course.


Thursday, May 21, 2009

Poetry FAIL

Posted at CARM in 2009 (can't find exact date). Creationist: Sport

This is only one example of the sheer idiocy, hate, and willful ignorance of the United States' Creationist:

Sport's Poem to the Evolutionary Scientists:
Here's a "poem" for you:

Thanks, evos, for all those people you've murdered around the world.

Thanks for replacing Christianity with Humanism.
Thanks for warping our kids' minds through your media and textbooks.

Thanks for making everyone think it's "only natural" for a guy to shove his penis in another guy's rectum.
Thanks for making everyone believe angry bull-dykes are sexy.

Thanks for trashing our universities with your limp-wristed, leftist professors.
And thanks for all those babies you've managed to get your hands on and kill.

Thanks for your complete and utter failure in everything you do or try.
Thanks for making everyone question their faith.

Thanks for wiping the smiles off everyone's faces.
Thanks for your lies.

Thanks for spreading hate around the world.
Thanks for making America care what France thinks about anything.

Thanks for making regular citizens pay millions for all your worthless lab/DNA experiments.
Thanks for all of your Eugenics and Euthenasia efforts -- those have been a great help.

Thanks for removing any and all personal responsibility from society by claiming bad behavior is all "in the genes."

Thanks for your desire to scrap The Constitution.and disarm the Military.
Thanks for your redistribution of wealth -- from us to you.

Thanks for your foe battle against diseases and endless empty promises for cures.
Thanks for genetically altering everyone's food. I'm sure you know better than God does.

Thanks for taking nearly all the purpose beauty and love out of life.
Thanks for your undying support for your heros Hitler, Stalin, Kim's Il Dong, and all the other murderous atheist freaks around the world

Thanks for Not caring about our traditions and our faiths
Thanks for Not caring about morals

Thanks for ruining our country.
Thanks for nothing......"

He sounds like a loving Christian that bothered to study before opening his mouth (er, flexing his fingers) doesn't he?


Wednesday, May 20, 2009

Hatemongering FAIL

Posted at CARM on May 20th, 2009. Creationist: Scar

Conversation about hating and dissing other religions because they don't believe in the Christian God. Citing VenomFangX's YouTube video where he said "Satan Created Evil Islam". He got banned, just so you know (thank pun intended). He's an ignorant tool. Pure and simple.

My question:
he put up a video called: "Satan Made Evil Islam". How is this not hate-mongering?

It was removed several times and he put them right back up. Why are you sympathetic for this guy? He's a dirtbag! He's using his "faith" to promote hate. Anyone can see that if anyone's ever watched ONE of his pieces.

Scar's answer:
how is attacking Islam hate-mongering exactly? do explain

Headdesk on that one, right? how is hating a religion and posting inflammatory videos about how their religion was made by Satan NOT hate-mongering? I don't know either.


Sunday, May 17, 2009

Technology FAIL

Posted at CARM on May 17th, 2009. Creationist: Sport.

So virtually all scientists are fools?

Why then pay any attention to what we do or say? Why support our work with tax dollars?

Sports reply:
good question. I ask that all the time. I wouldn't mind going back to the 1700s. I've about decided that all areas of science are evil, including technological sciences. Technology is ruining this country. I can't think of a single piece of technology that hasn't hurt society.

Like defibrillators? MRI and CAT scan machines? Toilets? My favorite is the COMPUTER he's using to TYPE his damn POST! lol


Friday, May 15, 2009


Posted at CARM on May 15th, 2009. Creationist: Nate

Earlier in the conversation (about transitional fossils) Nate kicked it off with:
But now that the fossil record fails the TOE, they have to use an example of something made by intelligent designers. So the example proves that complex things have to have a designer.

Show us where the fossil record in any way fails the ToE.

Nate's Reply:
That has been done many times, as all the evos can come up with are similarities in fossils. Which proves how good my logic is, as all I ask for is the real deal and not a fantasy.
But this isn't what the example proved. To prove something is to provide a deductive certainty. AT BEST what you could have shown was an inductive argument. You are using words that you don't understand the meaning of.

BTW - this statement is one that is easily shot through by the existence of snow flakes (which are complex things without designers).

Keep in mind, this is assuming your premises were correct.

Nate's Genius Response:
Someone was trying to say that I was saying or trying to say that computers were living things. But my point is that since I know that fossils were living creatures at one time, I can not be saying that computers are living things, because I stated they were non-living things (computers). Again my Einstein comprehension shines through.

No...we don't know where it came from. No...we don't know what it means. doesn't make sense. We do however know that his Einstein comprehension is probably comparable to an autistic dog with a nick name of Einstein.


Thursday, May 7, 2009

Definition FAIL

Posted at CARM on May 8th, 2009. Creationist: Sport.

Original Comment:
Philosophers and ancient thinkers deduced that the earth orbited around the sun based on observations long before the tools existed to prove heliocentrism. Like those early thinkers, Darwin deduced through observation and those that came after modified and expounded the theory to what it is today.

Congrats Sport, you just figured out how science works!

Sport's Reply:
I don't think real science should be about "deduction," especially when there is no evidence from which to deduce (think Darwin), but instead by experimental/observational evidence. mean the deductions made by having experimental and observational evidence like FOSSILS...ummm...DNA....ummm...ALL OF BIOLOGY?!

Those kinds of deductions? Sill panda. That's what science is! Deducing based on evidence! Just because you don't believe the evidence doesn't mean it's not there. lol