Yummy's first post at CARM on the Evo/ID debate forum is:
how is it there are PYGMIES + DWARFS??"
What? Yeah, I don't know either.
"the Sun would be blocked by the EARTH, thus it would appear that the entire world (=the Moon) went dark".
Anyone who thinks that those fossils I posted of fish eating other fish or being destroyed while giving birth (that from an evolutionist website no less) are not the result of instantaneous destruction and imprint upon the surrounding rocks are utterly dishonest. They aren't even worth communicating with.
I will wait to see if there are honest posters who wish to discuss this.
"...and the flood came and took them all away." Jesus Christ.
This fish like multiplied millions of others was killed instantly and pressure made the imprint in soft rock. WHY WAS THE ROCK SOFT at that moment? You see that's a hint that evolutionists rarely ever think about.
Another reason evolution is bogus. Sports superstars. Musical superstars. Indeed any superstars in a particular field.Umm no. I know computers but my family doesn't. Does that mean I have a computer gene/trait? NO! Idiot.
They get born into families mostly who did not possess such outstanding talent. In many cases, the rest of their families were not even interested in their field.
Evolutionists will have us believe that the traits of parents and grandparents will be passed to the child. If this were really true then you'd find generations after generations of sportstars, musicians etc. producing world class performers. Indeed we'd find that they would have as many kids as possible in the hope one would inherit that magical gene and make a fortune.
We don't see that, do we?
Are you unaware that there is as much serious scientific debate on the occurance of evolution as there is on the existance of gravity...namely none?Scar's response:
turkeys don't vote for Christmas
Magic belongs to a realm of the spirit world that God never uses. It is the opposite to the power of God.
No, Not ONE.
I remember the fossil transition before tiktaalik came along (i still have my textbook), they knew EXACTLY what they were looking for.
Not a drawing of one. LOL
Hint for the Quiz: the KKK, Aryan Nations and Christian Identity groups are unalterably PRO-Creationism.
I am talking about the "Father of evolution", not some random groups of people.
So, when a person learns a new language, are you saying that 'evos' claim it is the result of mutations?
Whatever are you carryiong on about?
Evos say only populations evolve. Individuals (supposedly) are stuck with their genes. Genes are dumb. Genes don't learn, right? How do you explain the fact that cells and genes (which are just dumb matter) actually learn and comprehend things?
Here's a "poem" for you:
Thanks, evos, for all those people you've murdered around the world.
Thanks for replacing Christianity with Humanism.
Thanks for warping our kids' minds through your media and textbooks.
Thanks for making everyone think it's "only natural" for a guy to shove his penis in another guy's rectum.
Thanks for making everyone believe angry bull-dykes are sexy.
Thanks for trashing our universities with your limp-wristed, leftist professors.
And thanks for all those babies you've managed to get your hands on and kill.
Thanks for your complete and utter failure in everything you do or try.
Thanks for making everyone question their faith.
Thanks for wiping the smiles off everyone's faces.
Thanks for your lies.
Thanks for spreading hate around the world.
Thanks for making America care what France thinks about anything.
Thanks for making regular citizens pay millions for all your worthless lab/DNA experiments.
Thanks for all of your Eugenics and Euthenasia efforts -- those have been a great help.
Thanks for removing any and all personal responsibility from society by claiming bad behavior is all "in the genes."
Thanks for your desire to scrap The Constitution.and disarm the Military.
Thanks for your redistribution of wealth -- from us to you.
Thanks for your foe battle against diseases and endless empty promises for cures.
Thanks for genetically altering everyone's food. I'm sure you know better than God does.
Thanks for taking nearly all the purpose beauty and love out of life.
Thanks for your undying support for your heros Hitler, Stalin, Kim's Il Dong, and all the other murderous atheist freaks around the world
Thanks for Not caring about our traditions and our faiths
Thanks for Not caring about morals
Thanks for ruining our country.
Thanks for nothing......"
he put up a video called: "Satan Made Evil Islam". How is this not hate-mongering?
It was removed several times and he put them right back up. Why are you sympathetic for this guy? He's a dirtbag! He's using his "faith" to promote hate. Anyone can see that if anyone's ever watched ONE of his pieces.
how is attacking Islam hate-mongering exactly? do explain
So virtually all scientists are fools?
Why then pay any attention to what we do or say? Why support our work with tax dollars?
good question. I ask that all the time. I wouldn't mind going back to the 1700s. I've about decided that all areas of science are evil, including technological sciences. Technology is ruining this country. I can't think of a single piece of technology that hasn't hurt society.
But now that the fossil record fails the TOE, they have to use an example of something made by intelligent designers. So the example proves that complex things have to have a designer.
Show us where the fossil record in any way fails the ToE.
That has been done many times, as all the evos can come up with are similarities in fossils. Which proves how good my logic is, as all I ask for is the real deal and not a fantasy.Response:
But this isn't what the example proved. To prove something is to provide a deductive certainty. AT BEST what you could have shown was an inductive argument. You are using words that you don't understand the meaning of.
BTW - this statement is one that is easily shot through by the existence of snow flakes (which are complex things without designers).
Keep in mind, this is assuming your premises were correct.
Someone was trying to say that I was saying or trying to say that computers were living things. But my point is that since I know that fossils were living creatures at one time, I can not be saying that computers are living things, because I stated they were non-living things (computers). Again my Einstein comprehension shines through.
Philosophers and ancient thinkers deduced that the earth orbited around the sun based on observations long before the tools existed to prove heliocentrism. Like those early thinkers, Darwin deduced through observation and those that came after modified and expounded the theory to what it is today.
Congrats Sport, you just figured out how science works!
I don't think real science should be about "deduction," especially when there is no evidence from which to deduce (think Darwin), but instead by experimental/observational evidence.