Dwarf FAIL

Posted at CARM on May 30th, 2009. Possible Creationist (he/she's new) Yummy.

Yummy's first post at CARM on the Evo/ID debate forum is:

how is it there are PYGMIES + DWARFS??"

What? Yeah, I don't know either.

-Erin

Eclipse FAIL

Posted at CARM on May 29th, 2009. Creationist: Yank (ex evolutionary science teacher, by the way).

Yank's understanding of the eclipse mentioned in the Bible and his defense of how he accidently proved the Gospels wrong.

"the Sun would be blocked by the EARTH, thus it would appear that the entire world (=the Moon) went dark".

Let me translate that. The sun would be blocked by the Earth (=lunar eclipse). Thus it would appear that the entire world (=the moon?) went dark (=solar eclipse). What was it? A solar or a luna eclipse? And how is the entire world the moon?

From a SCIENCE TEACHER! Now we know why the US is so damn far behind!

-Erin

Fish FAIL

Posted at CARM on May 29th, 2009. Creationist: Yank (the epic).

Yank's Comment:

Anyone who thinks that those fossils I posted of fish eating other fish or being destroyed while giving birth (that from an evolutionist website no less) are not the result of instantaneous destruction and imprint upon the surrounding rocks are utterly dishonest. They aren't even worth communicating with.

I will wait to see if there are honest posters who wish to discuss this.

"...and the flood came and took them all away." Jesus Christ.

So fish give birth now?! I thought they laid eggs!

-Erin

Rock FAIL

Posted at CARM on May 29th, 2009. Creationist: Yank

Comment:

This fish like multiplied millions of others was killed instantly and pressure made the imprint in soft rock. WHY WAS THE ROCK SOFT at that moment? You see that's a hint that evolutionists rarely ever think about.

Geology fail at its best. why was the rock soft? Because it wasn't rock. Der. Sand that turns to stone, becomes SANDSTONE. DUH.

-Erin

Trait FAIL

Posted at CARM on May 28th, 2009. Creationist: Scar, yet again. No turkey's this time.

No back story, this is the original, starting post.

Scar:

Another reason evolution is bogus. Sports superstars. Musical superstars. Indeed any superstars in a particular field.

They get born into families mostly who did not possess such outstanding talent. In many cases, the rest of their families were not even interested in their field.

Evolutionists will have us believe that the traits of parents and grandparents will be passed to the child. If this were really true then you'd find generations after generations of sportstars, musicians etc. producing world class performers. Indeed we'd find that they would have as many kids as possible in the hope one would inherit that magical gene and make a fortune.

We don't see that, do we?

Umm no. I know computers but my family doesn't. Does that mean I have a computer gene/trait? NO! Idiot.

Topic FAIL

Posted at CARM on May 27th, 2009. Creationist: Scar

Comment:

Are you unaware that there is as much serious scientific debate on the occurance of evolution as there is on the existance of gravity...namely none?

Scar's response:

turkeys don't vote for Christmas

Go ahead. I'll wait for you to try and figure out what the hell that comment meant and how it fits into the conversation on "why don't scientists debate evolution with other scientists". Screen saver face.

_Erin

Magic FAIL

Posted at CARM on May 24th, 2009. Creationist: Candle.

Candles rebut to God creating being akin to magic:

Magic belongs to a realm of the spirit world that God never uses. It is the opposite to the power of God.

Really?

-Erin