I think you forget that many evolutionists believe the baby is not alive until sometime after it's born. They call it a "zygote" which is another name for "worthless mass of biological material not worth saving by someone who hates babies."
So you are unable to furnish an observed example of a mutation creating a new relevant beneficial structrire
Maniraptoran arms modified into bird wings. You think evolution can do something that it can't. It's changes in EXISTING genetic materials. Why would you think a crocodile would grow a wing? That's not how evolution works. Why do you think evolution via a single mutation would give you a, as you say, "relevant beneficial structrire"? Is your comprehension of evolution so poor? No wonder you rant and rave against the evolution that lives in your mind - it IS quite silly compared to the real thing.
bacteria don't have wings.
evolution occurs only in biology. nature has nothing to do with it
Wow. How sad "science" has become. And these folks have a problem with the Bible?? Evolution, the big-bang hoax, extra-terrestrials, etc. These bogus beliefs violate the most basic of scientific tenets - demonstrable and provable. Yet, in their arrogance, the scientific community puts forth hypotheses on what occurred billions of years ago as if they could possibly know. Just as the Bible says in Psalm 15 and Psalm 43 - "The fool has said in his heart, There is no God."
I came from my parents. They look a lot like me.
Sir Isaac Newton (the Father of Science) used the word "senseless" when speaking of atheism. After speaking with thousands who believe as you do, I have come to the conclusion that atheism is more than senseless. For example, how about you make me a hummingbird, from nothing? You had better make two, because you will need both male and female for them to be able to reproduce. You could start by making a tiny brain, matching eyes, a heart, a liver, two legs, and matching wings that flap faster than the eye can see. You will also need to put “life” into the bird, so that the inanimate machine you have made can think for itself and fly. Isn’t it true that you don’t have a clue where to begin? Yet, as an atheist, you believe (and so does Richard Dawkins) that nothing made it from nothing. That is both scientifically impossible and ludicrous. To be honest, I'm intellectually embarrassed to be of the same species as those who believe such things.
birds living in and around mercury act gay, scientists confirm.....vaccines have had mercury in them for decades and the number of vaccines is ever-increasing as the years pass; there's been an explosion of gay over the past 30 years. just coincidence in your mind? is this not worth testing? scientists screw around test all kinds of unnecessary crap -- why not this?
...the chemo probably zapped his immune system, which means he'll be helpless if the cancer comes back.
First, when we’re born, Big Science puts us on a regiment of fake vaccinations; vaccinations which are highly toxic and probably result in all kinds of diseases like autism, adhd, and homosexuality and other disorders.
smallpox was cured by a small-town doctor who learned to rub cowpox scabs on sick patients.....all I'm saying is that it doesn't take a Ph.D for this.... a monkey could have learned to prevent smallpox.
Endurance is built not inherited. In fact newborns can't run. Period.
So evolutionists are limited to their myths, legends and fairy tails and reject science and history.
Obviously, seriously deluded people think that those people who oppose them are seriously deluded. That goes without saying.
Atheists as well have a personal awareness of God when they feel guilt for something wrong which they have done. When they rage against God in their fervour to prove him non-existent. It is said that the most ardent believers in God are the communist atheists who would get together in anti-God meetings to bolster one anothers non-belief in the face of the ever present and inescapable presence of God.
A Christian has 100% proof because he has the faith of God, which the scripture describes as being the EVIDENCE of things not seen.
"I don't need to know my science to take on a scientist of any calibre."
Though to say that this controversial snowball earth existed before all know life forms? Your suggesting this snowball wiped out all life and then it started over again via evolution. Unless the earth was an asteroid flying threw space collecting frozen gas(basically becoming covered with ice) and then eventually being caught by our suns orbit/ and the ices melted forming gases and liquids? Those tropical glaciers would have to be composed of much more then water.
I believe this big freeze may be the REAL reason the dinosaurs went extinct, and the primates finished off the rest of them. The asteroid theory is nonsense. I also beleive that the because of the earth's rotation, most of the earth's heat is drawn towards the equator. It is very unlikely the equator became frozen over solid. I'd say certain species survived(including the primates), and many specdies(like dinosaurs)became extinct whether it was lack of food, climate or they became prey.
Yes, it is interesting to think how much water left the earth after the flood year!
Arguing for science: "Theory of evolution shows us that all animal life is related. Creationists deny it.
The fact that monotremes share mammalian, avian and reptilian characteristics is strong evidence that ToE is correct and is another nail in the coffin of creationism and "intelligent" design."
Twinc: this disproves rather than proves evolution - so everything evolved from the platypus,but what did the platypus evolve from?
